blond with unpublished name

drdave

Active member
i think these two sets are the same gal

note earring, flatness of right nip

anybody disagree?

is there any way to give her a bucket at indexxx?

met-art 2004-09-16 bambola and 2004-11-11 sphere

bambola.022.jpgbambola.034.jpgunnamed.sphere016.jpgunnamed.sphere026.jpg
 
Bambola

Bambola

She is alrerady listed on the INDEXXX as " Bambola "
http://www.indexxx.com/images/sets/met-art-002DD7A4EDB652C5F50D0AD4C0D0C79C-223506.jpg
"Bambola" - Met ART - http://static-www.met-art.com/met-art_covers/040916-MODELS-YURYEV-251-1390.jpg
When I searched the Photographer for this set I found this:
http://www.met-art.com/guests/model/models-no-name/gallery/20040916/BAMBOLA/ and again as "No Name Model"
Yuryev had to maintain a file on each model to verify that they were 18 at the time the photo shoot was done. So her name info is out there it is just a matter of time and finding it.
The Listing on Indexxx - although it will bring up the Met Art model photographed by Yuri Yuryev in a set titled " Bambola" --- does not specifically NAME her as "Bambola. Met Art's Model Listing has amongst Unnamed Models and so does give a name for either other than the "set" name of Bambola. I have done a pretty exhaustive search and have come up SOME possibilities (1) is named "Narkiss", another is "Joulie A" of Met art.
Here, also on Met Art, she appears as "Joulie B"
cover_25287B6BA268DC32F964F740CBCE2F2E.jpg
I think this may be the "Unknown Model". BUT, since I have been wrong before I am open to suggestion by any and all who might refute my choice for a match to the Model being searched for.
Any one finding a match they feel is better PLEASE let me know by messaging to my profile. I WOULD like to know who she IS if this is not she so I can add her correctly to MY archives.
" Hilary A" of Met Art has also done a set titled "Bambola"

mstlpflx

PS: drdave I agree with you that all the pics YOU posted are the same model AND ..... I am still searching.

***** It appears there is a large section of the Met Art Models who ARE "Models No Name" I have nothing on the one we are searching so I suggest we just TEMPORARILY name her for the Set we search for " Bambola" it is a good name and in Italian means " baby" or "Doll" and she is most definitely a "Babydoll"
So, what do you think , Webmaster ??

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
i think these two sets are the same gal

note earring, flatness of right nip

anybody disagree?

is there any way to give her a bucket at indexxx?

met-art 2004-09-16 bambola and 2004-11-11 sphere

View attachment 1642View attachment 1643View attachment 1644View attachment 1641
 
Last edited:
More on Models No Name

More on Models No Name

All the pics above in your post are from the same Photographer - Yuri Yurev or just Yurev. There are 3 sets on the Met Art site with this model in them " Bambola", "Sphere" and "the Lost Pictures".
A picture from Sphere led me to this site through Google ( http://rucasting.com/3123/391)
This pic is on the "front page" of the site --
yuryev_14_46.jpg
So, I searched the models listed there and the only one I find that is even close to the model we are searching for is ---
( http://ru-casting.com/mariya-sheremetova ) " Mariya Sheremetova " ----
mg8411.jpg

What do YOU think. Is this the model we are looking for ?

Then I found this model ---- http://www.indexxx.com/models/26566/diaz-a/
on indexxx , I think this is her. Check out the free galleries on "thenude.eu" of " Lana B "
Especially the one from "Just Nude" .
 
Last edited:
i looked carefully at the women you posted and i think, no

given the apparently huge amount of effort you have put into this ID (you're a friggin' machine), and my own efforts, and no doubt the unsung efforts of others, i think if she was IDable we would know by now.

i think your suggestion of naming her Bambola is a good one

bambola is indeed the italian for the english word "doll." (per google translate)

edit: the woman with the yellow background is most definitely her

All the pics above in your post are from the same Photographer - Yuri Yurev or just Yurev. There are 3 sets on the Met Art site with this model in them " Bambola", "Sphere" and "the Lost Pictures".
A picture from Sphere led me to this site through Google ( http://rucasting.com/3123/391)
This pic is on the "front page" of the site --
View attachment 1653
So, I searched the models listed there and the only one I find that is even close to the model we are searching for is ---
( http://ru-casting.com/mariya-sheremetova ) " Mariya Sheremetova " ----
View attachment 1654

What do YOU think. Is this the model we are looking for ?

Then I found this model ---- http://www.indexxx.com/models/26566/diaz-a/
on indexxx , I think this is her. Check out the free galleries on "thenude.eu" of " Lana B "
Especially the one from "Just Nude" .
 
Last edited:
FOUND !!!!!! ---- Met Art Model "No Name "

FOUND !!!!!! ---- Met Art Model "No Name "

I went back the Russian model site. I knew they HAD to be the site to look at because they feature one of her pics from a
set she did on the "cover page" for the site. So, I managed to get into the model Portfolio listings and VIOLA - I submit for approval ------- "Valeria Kulipanov "
http://translate.googleusercontent....r/6630&usg=ALkJrhhIt2zgIiws6AZhXGsURqIfjs-LMQ
vpl.jpg -- 21.jpg
The profile states she is 17 but there is no refference date as to when the profile was created. So, assuming she was 18 when the Met Art sets were taken in 2004, she would have been born in 1986 and the Model Casting Profile posted in 2003. So with only a year between the Profile and pics on Met Art............ I believe I found her. Now If she did some other sets maybe we can find them.
Look close at the pic from the original search post and she has a scar in the middle of her fore head that is quite visible in THAT picture. In the one from the model casting page she has a "mole" or some kind of mark on right side of her chest right below the collar bone. In the second pic I posted here if you look close there is a bad case of Photo-chopping in exactly that same spot. So, Again, I think this IS her.
Perhaps a New set
*** http://multimedia.blogosfere.it/v/m...25/Sofia+Gucci+and+Bambola+_+Mugello.jpg.html ***
--
Another "Bambola or the same , just older ?? __ 24302-set.jpg
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

i looked carefully at the women you posted and i think, no

given the apparently huge amount of effort you have put into this ID (you're a friggin' machine), and my own efforts, and no doubt the unsung efforts of others, i think if she was IDable we would know by now.

i think your suggestion of naming her Bambola is a good one

bambola is indeed the italian for the english word "doll." (per google translate)

edit: the woman with the yellow background is most definitely her
 
Last edited:
uhh ... i hate to sound thick but i dont follow your logic

i dont say you're wrong but

can you post the pix that led you to your conclusion?

i can see in the seascape pic the skin mark on the forehead you are talking about

it looks like old stitches

I went back the Russian model site. I knew they HAD to be the site to look at because they feature one of her pics from a
set she did on the "cover page" for the site. So, I managed to get into the model Portfolio listings and VIOLA - I submit for approval ------- "Valeria Kulipanov "
http://translate.googleusercontent....r/6630&usg=ALkJrhhIt2zgIiws6AZhXGsURqIfjs-LMQ
View attachment 1660 -- View attachment 1661
The profile states she is 17 but there is no refference date as to when the profile was created. So, assuming she was 18 when the Met Art sets were taken in 2004, she would have been born in 1986 and the Model Casting Profile posted in 2003. So with only a year between the Profile and pics on Met Art............ I believe I found her. Now If she did some other sets maybe we can find them.
Look close at the pic from the original search post and she has a scar in the middle of her fore head that is quite visible in THAT picture. In the one from the model casting page she has a "mole" or some kind of mark on right side of her chest right below the collar bone. In the second pic I posted here if you look close there is a bad case of Photo-chopping in exactly that same spot. So, Again, I think this IS her.
Perhaps a New set
*** http://multimedia.blogosfere.it/v/m...25/Sofia+Gucci+and+Bambola+_+Mugello.jpg.html ***
--
Another "Bambola or the same , just older ?? __ View attachment 1662
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
Bambola

Bambola

drdave ,
I went back to the site where I saw her on their front page in a pic from the Met Art set "Sphere" by Yuryev
( http://ru-casting.com/3123/391 )
yuryev_14_46.jpg
I then searched the model profiles till I found her. "Valeria Kulipanov" .
vpl.jpg
The pics are of low quality but I seriously believe this is the Model We are searching for. Her hair parts and lies the same, shape of nose is same, height of brow is same, shape and puffiness of lips are the same. Jawline is the same. Dimples are the same. Look at the side by side pics. Keep in mind one MAY be when she is 17 and the other when she is 18 OR older.
I tried to enhance a pic to where the scar was visible and I could make it out but again as I said the pics are of such low quality that I don't realy think they would convince someone else. So, I did NOT post the enhanced pic.
Any way I think the model on Indexxx will be called Bambola because no POSITIVE ID has been found yet.
And if I might make a ask your indulgence for a request in the future , please, don't just say "no that's not her" or "bump" --- offer some one as an alternative. We are all looking to identify and list these girls ( I think) . So, if I'm wrong and you're right -- that's FINE by me. I just want to get them listed correctly so that the work they have done can be given the proper credit it deserves. Instead of being like "Yuryev" and just calling them " Models - NO Name" . To me that is one of the MOST disrespectful things that can be done to one of these Models. It like saying they don't exist and the only thing that ever came of their lives or was left to remember them by was a few NUDE PORNO pics with NO NAME.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
uhh ... i hate to sound thick but i dont follow your logic

i dont say you're wrong but

can you post the pix that led you to your conclusion?

i can see in the seascape pic the skin mark on the forehead you are talking about

it looks like old stitches
 
Last edited:
the casting pic you posted is indeed pretty freakin' close

they eye color is wrong but i am sure we are all painfully aware that doesnt necessarily mean anything. you can change a person's apparent eye color just by moving a light source 5 degrees one way or the other

i still dont understand where the pic came from. i looked over the casting site to no avail (i speak of the pic that looks like it could be a high-school portrait) i did a text search of the multiple pages labelled "models," "girls," "actors" (if memory serves). nada. did i just miss it somehow? are they rotating stock photos?

if i have no better suggestion as to the ID of a model, what can i say? if i cant say no my only alternative is to not post a reply, in which case you (or whoever) will not know whether i have
even read the previous post.

as far as respecting the models, i fully agree that a person should be honored for the work they do.
but you have to remember, some of these women dont want their names used. i guesstimate 90% of them are requesting pseudonyms in the first place. hell, if i were a porn site owner, i might even require it. there is also the possibilty that Bambola is her name, as in, actually on her birth certificate. less-likely names than that have been used. i knew a gal once whose surname was Belch. she was well aware of the english meaning.

i think your idea of contacting the photographer is brilliant. i had just started down that mental road when i read your second reply. i had not yet figured out how to even look for his/her contact info.

as you can probably tell, i am a cynical s.o.b. Mstlpflx, you have already demonstrated much more ... patience? faith? in your search than i have ever had in mine. muchas gracias



I have sent a request to Yuri Yuriev requesting the name of the Model who posed for the " Bambola, Sphere and the Lost pictures sets" at Met Art. Hopefully he will respond and we will soon have an answer.
( http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=auto&tl=en&u=http://ru-casting.com/3123/391 )
mstlpflx
 
Last edited:
Bambola

Bambola

Batman,
This another of the photos from the set " Bambola " ---
5411337.jpg
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Nice discussion guys!

Just added her here: http://www.indexxx.com/models/80598/bambola/

The 'sphere' set picture leads to http://ru-casting.com/3123/391 , which is a portfolio of the photographer Yuri Yuriev (http://www.yu-foto.ru/ ).
But I don't think she is Valeria Kulipanov, because the hair line of Bambola begins much lower.
 
thanks for giving her a home

***

she looks to me genetically more northwestern european than eastern european or russian

i.e. nordic / swedish / finnish / icelandic

i dont know the proper term

of course she could have been born anywhere and assumed any alias
 
Last edited:
Back
Top