I am aware, that those people, who are responsible for the quality of the pictures, won't possibly read this. When i wrote poor quality, i don't think of models, i don't think of incapable photograher.
The Models are adorable and the photographer are adepts. What i think of is the format of the pictures, jpeg is a lossy format, the compression and subsequent size of memory.
I do not have a problem with pictures with 10 mb per picture. I have problems with jpeg-fragmets! I know that many user won't magnify their pictures on the computer. I do. I magnify to the labia, the eyes, the mouth and teeth. I have no problem with pimples and moles. Each vulva and labia of a woman is unique and a kind of flower (or prune). So i want to see it like on a real photo with the complete structure.
amourangels.com, showybeauty.com and teenpornstorage.com (they belongs somehow together) have nearly accaptable pictures, in packrate and memory size. Not so the most other sites. I found at metart.com sets with 10 mb per picture, but them are form nearly 2012, before Met-Art reconvert to pictures with 1.5 to 2.8 mb size.
So if one of the responsible from Met-Art, Nubiles, 18Eighteen and Naughtimag, Karups, ATK, Teenflood, Eyecandyavenue, ... read this: Change this!
I think either, that the size of pictures should be 4000x3000 pixel and greater. Even old sets deserve it to bring it in new, greater size.
Ther is a bad habit to photoshop pictures. Moles, pimples and warts are not usually beautyful. But a photoshoped picture is worse as a wart!
The Models are adorable and the photographer are adepts. What i think of is the format of the pictures, jpeg is a lossy format, the compression and subsequent size of memory.
I do not have a problem with pictures with 10 mb per picture. I have problems with jpeg-fragmets! I know that many user won't magnify their pictures on the computer. I do. I magnify to the labia, the eyes, the mouth and teeth. I have no problem with pimples and moles. Each vulva and labia of a woman is unique and a kind of flower (or prune). So i want to see it like on a real photo with the complete structure.
amourangels.com, showybeauty.com and teenpornstorage.com (they belongs somehow together) have nearly accaptable pictures, in packrate and memory size. Not so the most other sites. I found at metart.com sets with 10 mb per picture, but them are form nearly 2012, before Met-Art reconvert to pictures with 1.5 to 2.8 mb size.
So if one of the responsible from Met-Art, Nubiles, 18Eighteen and Naughtimag, Karups, ATK, Teenflood, Eyecandyavenue, ... read this: Change this!
I think either, that the size of pictures should be 4000x3000 pixel and greater. Even old sets deserve it to bring it in new, greater size.
Ther is a bad habit to photoshop pictures. Moles, pimples and warts are not usually beautyful. But a photoshoped picture is worse as a wart!