Unidentified Message to ADMINS: New category for Posts/ Threads

mstlpflx

Well-known member
New category for Posts/ Threads.
I'd like to suggest a New category for posts/ threads,
I.E. existing categories are "Identified", "Unidentifiable".
Perhaps another like
"Dead Links"
would help in the BABEID section of this site.
There are many of the threads in the "Unidentifiable area
that will NEVER be found because they have 1) nothing to be
found in them - no links, no image, no nothing or 2) the
thread/post has links that do not exist any longer.
I mean the "Unidentifiable" has grown to quite a large section of the
site. It would be easier to find any of those ID requests that ARE findable
if the TRASH that is there were out of the way.
And, there may not BE anyone else who is looking at those old posts
to take another look at IDing them other than myself but it would still help
the site as a whole to clean it up a little and make things work a little easier.
Whatta y'say ADMINS?
example ....
 
I have to admit I don't go to the unidentified section much, I'm afraid many posts there are just lost to time, if someone couldn't ID them when the post was still active in ID a babe, chances are they'll never be ID'd, either not a good enough image, or not enough information.
 
I have to admit I don't go to the unidentified section much, I'm afraid many posts there are just lost to time, if someone couldn't ID them when the post was still active in ID a babe, chances are they'll never be ID'd, either not a good enough image, or not enough information.
I have been working the ID a Babe section of this site on a fairly daily basis for years.
Working to the tune of something close to 6000 posts/ threads.
I work the ID section and have been going back through the "Unidentifiable" section as well.
**The "Unidentifiable" section exists due to my suggestion some time in the past.
If I am not mistaken.
As I go through it I find that some of the posts are there due to there being NOTHING in the
post to search for. NO image, NO link, NOT even a good description of what the person who
made the post was searching for, when they made the post.
** I ** put them there.
Some of the posts there have been put there by people who want to find a model and having
searched for them, themselves - with no success, put them in the "Unidentifiable" section of the site.
Look at the recent additions to the "Identified" section of the site that I have found in the past few days.
Most of them came from the "Unidentifiable" pages.
It would be helpful to get the DEAD linked or vacant search posts out of the way.
There are posts like " I want to find this model from a page I saw" and then no image, no link, no nothing to search for.
Those need to be gone.
Can you do anything about that?
 
I sometimes look through "Unidentifiable" to see if something is, in fact, identifiable and just been consigned there prematurely. That's less of a problem than it used to be. Sometimes, I think there are requests that can go directly to "Identified", as in, the poster has already given the name or source for the image, and no, there really is no more out there, or, no, she really has never done porn.
 
I sometimes look through "Unidentifiable" to see if something is, in fact, identifiable and just been consigned there prematurely. That's less of a problem than it used to be. Sometimes, I think there are requests that can go directly to "Identified", as in, the poster has already given the name or source for the image, and no, there really is no more out there, or, no, she really has never done porn.
I was hoping for a reply from a site ADMIN.
 
There are only two: @admin2 and @Batman — who should both have been alerted now :)
I know this and neither of them will answer. not via email or through the site or direct messaging to their profile.
I have been tempted to systematically go through the site and delete all that I have done on it and leave it completely.
Site Admins or Moderators should actively participate in the workings of a site and ANSWER when they are directly asked a question.
 
Back
Top