Errors & Bugs to Fix
- Thread starter Admin
- Start date
I was trying a different internal page element structure using JQuery. I changed it back immediately because of your post. New webbrowsers should render it correctly. Which browser are you using?
The all Jasmine @ FTVGirls is correct. What they basically do is they make multiple shoots of a single model (probably on the same day), and release it all on a single day under one cover photo, where most other companies would spread it over multiple days. But when clicking on the cover photo, the page will show multiple links, one for each photoshoot. Indexxx shows each of those photoshoots (including vids) as a single set.
Search should also work again.
The all Jasmine @ FTVGirls is correct. What they basically do is they make multiple shoots of a single model (probably on the same day), and release it all on a single day under one cover photo, where most other companies would spread it over multiple days. But when clicking on the cover photo, the page will show multiple links, one for each photoshoot. Indexxx shows each of those photoshoots (including vids) as a single set.
Search should also work again.
The newest version of FireFox
Then wouldn't it be better to Post the FTV Site with just the cover photo, since I know they do that. I've been a Member of FTV Girls for a very long time. I guess, seeing so many of the Jasmine @ FTV Girls all at one time confused me. Sorry.
It would also help, if I correctly spelled the Model's name I was searching for.
I have Indexxx back to the previous version yesterday, but this previous version contains a similar technique on the text lists at the bottom of http://www.indexxx.com/models/?l=z
Does this page render correctly? Do photos popup when hovering the mouse over the model text links at the bottom?
yes works fine
I've put a new internal page layout at indexxx. Can you confirm that it renders/shows correctly?
What it should do (as it always was) :
1) Larger photo pops up when hovering over a photoset thumbnail
2) "Free Gallery" in pink hovering over the photoset thumbnail for photosets that have a gallery associated.
3) Photosets with galleries should be clickable.
4) Model links for the photosets should popup a model photo
What it should do (as it always was) :
1) Larger photo pops up when hovering over a photoset thumbnail
2) "Free Gallery" in pink hovering over the photoset thumbnail for photosets that have a gallery associated.
3) Photosets with galleries should be clickable.
4) Model links for the photosets should popup a model photo
yuriyandropov
New member
a DDF mixup
a DDF mixup
The following photo sets:
DDF -> 1by-day->
107hot
6498
6650
6651
6654
6659
are wrongly credited to a group:
Adriana M, Aria Giovanni, Ashley, Claudia Possi, Kathy Blanche, Lolly Cat, Meggi, Niki
They should point only to Aria Giovanni, http://www.indexxx.com/models/1894/aria-giovanni/
a DDF mixup
The following photo sets:
DDF -> 1by-day->
107hot
6498
6650
6651
6654
6659
are wrongly credited to a group:
Adriana M, Aria Giovanni, Ashley, Claudia Possi, Kathy Blanche, Lolly Cat, Meggi, Niki
They should point only to Aria Giovanni, http://www.indexxx.com/models/1894/aria-giovanni/
Hey yuriyandropov,
Since you like finding Models to merge on this Site, I have an interesting assignment for ya.
I'm only doing Models, that are on Nubiles.net and have a Submitted Model Info Boxes I post in. Nubiles Models are from USA, Europe, Russia, Ukraine, and a few other Countries.
There are a lot of Network Sites NOT listed:
TeenMegaWorld Network
TeenCoreClub Network
Brazzers Network
Bang Bros. Network
Reality Kings Network
Reality Pass Plus Network
HD Porn Pass Network
Hardcore Porn Pass Network
Hush Pass Network
Naughty America Network
Pink Visual Network
Porn Pros Network
Swank Network
Mofos Network
Muffia Network
Mega Site Network and on and on.
All I know is, I have several of those Submitted Model Info Boxes filled with Model Info NOT on this Site. I don't have the time to go through all of those Networks and make Merge Lists like you are doing. Do you have the time to do so???
Since you like finding Models to merge on this Site, I have an interesting assignment for ya.
I'm only doing Models, that are on Nubiles.net and have a Submitted Model Info Boxes I post in. Nubiles Models are from USA, Europe, Russia, Ukraine, and a few other Countries.
There are a lot of Network Sites NOT listed:
TeenMegaWorld Network
TeenCoreClub Network
Brazzers Network
Bang Bros. Network
Reality Kings Network
Reality Pass Plus Network
HD Porn Pass Network
Hardcore Porn Pass Network
Hush Pass Network
Naughty America Network
Pink Visual Network
Porn Pros Network
Swank Network
Mofos Network
Muffia Network
Mega Site Network and on and on.
All I know is, I have several of those Submitted Model Info Boxes filled with Model Info NOT on this Site. I don't have the time to go through all of those Networks and make Merge Lists like you are doing. Do you have the time to do so???
yuriyandropov
New member
Dear deadip,
I am not sure what you are asking me to do. Specifically, I do not see Submitted Model Info Boxes on the indexxx site. There is a Submitted Links box on each model page, is that the one you are referring to?
Please feel to PM for a more elaborate description.
As an aside, I do not frequent most of the networks on your list, as I am interested primarily in Czech/Slovak, and to a lesser extent Russian and Hungarian models.
He means "Submitted Model Info" box from modelpages like at http://www.indexxx.com/models/26153/tiffany-sweet/ which is only visible when info is added to it. It's read-only for users by default.
At the moment, it's mostly use by Deadip as a documentation tool to sum websites and aliases in it, on which the associated model appeared. One problem with the box is that the data basically is pure text like a wiki (even though it has structure). In the ideal situation, this text will be transformed to structured data in the form of more advanced submitted links.
Another thing that will be implemented at indexxx, is the differentiation between gallery links and the originating website links (like DDF).
At the moment, it's mostly use by Deadip as a documentation tool to sum websites and aliases in it, on which the associated model appeared. One problem with the box is that the data basically is pure text like a wiki (even though it has structure). In the ideal situation, this text will be transformed to structured data in the form of more advanced submitted links.
Another thing that will be implemented at indexxx, is the differentiation between gallery links and the originating website links (like DDF).
Here lately I have included more Model Info besides just the Aliases and WebSites, that I used to do. Am now including Birthdate, Birthplace, Started Modeling Year, Measurements, Height, Tattoos, Piercings, Official WebSite (if any), Social Network Sites (if any), and DVDs they have done. As seen here for Sammie Rhodes
http://www.indexxx.com/models/3715/sammie-rhodes/
http://www.indexxx.com/models/3715/sammie-rhodes/
yuriyandropov
New member
I now see what he means. I am all for including as much data about the model as possible, but the presentation of this data suffers from a couple of drawbacks.
First of all it seems to be text-based. Ideally the model page should NOT contain any static HTML, all the data has to be server-side database-driven, with page having just CSS and some client-side Javascript only.
Secondly, on a very high-resolution monitor, a long "submitted model info" column pushes down the set covers and results in a lot of white space, not very pretty.
As seen, for example in http://www.indexxx.com/models/3715/sammie-rhodes/.
Nice!
Another feature that is on the todo list, is tagging, which allows users to mark/label a model with certain info, like "lesbian".
The model info data is server-sided, stored as plain text in the db.
I agree, it should be fixed now.